Elon Musk and Jordan Peterson blast Trudeau for proposed 'Orwellian' law targeting free speech of Canadians

"It's the most Orwellian piece of legislation ever promoted in the West," Peterson wrote of Bill C-63.

ADVERTISEMENT
Image
Jarryd Jaeger Vancouver, BC
ADVERTISEMENT

Since being tabled in February, the Trudeau Liberals' Online Harms Act has been met with criticism, namely from those who have interpreted the section dealing with "hate speech" to mean that the government is seeking to retroactively target people for content they've posted in the past.

Among those who have sounded the alarm over Bill C-63 are Elon Musk and Jordan Peterson, arguing that the new legislation would, if passed, turn Canada into an "Orwellian" nightmare.



"This sounds insane if accurate!" Musk wrote on X, citing a post highlighting the aforementioned threat of retroactive punishment.



"Mr. Musk," Peterson said in response. "It's much much worse than you have been informed: plans to shackle Canadians electronically if accusers fear a 'hate crime' might (might) be committed. It's the most Orwellian piece of legislation ever promoted in the West."



Musk went on to deem Bill C-63 "a terrible attack on the rights of Canadians to speak freely!"



"We have no such rights, sir," Peterson declared. "They were bargained away in the 1980's, with the 'notwithstanding' clause in our constitution, which basically gives the government unlimited power to suspend what should be basic freedoms." 

He suggested that Canadians are "seriously and appallingly asleep at the wheel," not only when it comes to free speech. 

"Our productivity is way below that of you Yankees," he lamented. "The forecast for our next thirty years is growth far below that of other developed countries; our PM hates the energy industry, which is one of Canada's great strengths; the federal cabinet is occupied by delusional, juvenile mountebanks and dreamy Marxist utopians. Not good."

Bill C-63 has not yet been debated in the House of Commons, and even after it is, it must be voted on by members, studied by a parliamentary committee, and dissected by witnesses.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign in to comment

Comments

Powered by The Post Millennial CMS™ Comments

Join and support independent free thinkers!

We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.

Support The Post Millennial

Remind me next month

To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
ADVERTISEMENT
© 2024 The Post Millennial, Privacy Policy | Do Not Sell My Personal Information