50% of Albertans see separation as a real possibility, Western Canada Party dominates poll
Western Canadian sentiments in regards to national unity appear to have hit a new low since the election of Justin Trudeau.
According to a new poll by Angus Reid, the animosity has gotten to a point where a majority of Albertans support separation as a real possibility. Enough Western Canadians would also support a Western Canada Party, if ever formed and the poll indicated that such a party could gain a notable number of seats.
The institute found that when they averaged support for the idea across all western provinces (BC, AB, SK, MB), the Western Canada Party actually came out ahead, with 35%, followed only by the Conservatives who brought in 29%.
Is separatism possible in 2019?
That depends on who you ask.
According to the poll, two-thirds of Canadians (68%) think Alberta separating from the rest of Canada is unlikely or “would never happen.”
In Alberta, half of the respondents (50%) see separation as a real possibility, and more than 60% would support a Western province-led
A video of an Albertan native discussing separatism sentiments currently has over 500,000 views, as well as 13,000 shares.
A majority of Saskatchewan voters polled would support Alberta in such a movement.
The poll also found that for every western province except Saskatchewan, anger towards Ottawa was higher than in 1991, when the western Reform party began to gain momentum.
The reform party took 52 seats in the following 1993 election and formed the official opposition in the 1997 election.
So what does this all mean?
The election of Justin Trudeau in 2015, appears to have almost decimated the Quebec separatist movement federally, and in its place re-stocked the fires of what seemed like long-dead sentiment of Western separatism.
While it is unlikely that British Columbia would join Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba, given their stark difference in current governing ideology, all four western provinces none the less appear to have enough angry pro-west individuals to seriously support a Western-province focused party.
This should be extremely worrying for both Andrew Scheer and Justin Trudeau.
If the Scheer team cannot properly absorb the energy from western provinces, the polls clearly show that they would be the biggest loser in parliament, losing swaths of seats in Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba.
This is just as bad, if not worse for the Prime Minister though.
If allowed to fester, Ottawa could face separatism from not just one province, but up to four provinces which are mobilized largely against his leadership.
That number could even spike to potentially five if Quebec nationalists (many who
In that situation, all Canadians lose as vultures attempt to take whatever piece they can, already articles have begun to be published in American sites imagining a future in which Alberta was the 51st state.
Could you imagine Quebec paying for its schools or hospitals without billions in federal transfers brought in from western provinces? Or any province negotiating a fair deal with the United States, when they can deal with each group individually?
I hope we can build this pipeline, and never have to find out.
What do you think? Join the conversation by commenting below!
The United Conservative Party (UCP) appears to be preparing for a fight for increased autonomy with the Trudeau government.
In their first annual meeting, members voted on through informal straw polls on a series of issues aimed at getting a “fair deal” from the Trudeau government.
From the province’s potential tax collection agency to the police force, trade relationships, pension plan, and firearms watchdog, members voted in large groups to support autonomy and further pull away from Ottawa.
A panel weighing those ideas is to complete its report by March 31.
“We are not seeking a special deal. We are simply seeking a fair deal,” Premier Jason Kenney told party faithful.
While not backing the secession movement, Wexit, the move to fight for autonomy is not surprising. Polls have placed Alberta’s desire to potentially declare independence close to if not higher than the separatist-prone province of Quebec.
The leader of the Parti Quebecois, Pascal Berube, has attacked Jason Kenney and his UCP in an opinion piece in the Calgary Herald.
In the article, Berube declared that Kenney was lying to Albertans about Albertan taxes paying for Quebec’s social infrastructure. Berube claimed that Kenney’s statements were “simply not true.”
Berube also took time to rebut Kenney’s indignation over equalization payments—an issue that Kenney will put to a referendum. Berube said that equalization payments were calculated based on the province’s ability to generate tax revenue, and thus “Albertans should not complain about paying for any of Quebec’s social programs. It simply is not true.”
Berube went on to say that “Alberta is a bigger spender than its leaders would like you to believe … Alberta is not some libertarian’s dream, as some would like you to believe. The province is a perfect example of ‘big government.’”
By saying this, Berube has labeled Kenney and the UCP as hypocritical and manipulative.
What was more piercing, however, was when Berube attacked Kenney directly, suggesting that Kenney was “looking for someone or something to blame for his gigantic fiscal deficit.”
Berube went on to say that “Albertans need to realize that their leaders have let them down … he will seal his place as the proud heir of past leaders who drove Alberta to the brink of the fiscal precipice where it now finds itself.”
Berube’s attack is the latest incident in a war of words between the two provinces. Previously, Bloc Quebecois Leader Yves-Francois Blanchet and CAQ leader Francois Legault had criticized Kenney and the Wexit movement. Blanchet, for example, has also disputed Kenney’s equalization claims, declaring that Alberta doesn’t “send a cheque to Quebec.”
Blanchet has also ridiculed the broad sentiment of alienation in the western province, stating that “the desire to do whatever they want with their oil might not be a sufficient reason to fuel a desire to become a country.”
A public art display in Montreal’s downtown core has drawn the ire of residents who believe the city’s spending is irresponsible.
According to Director Quebec of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation Renaud Brossard, that $800,000 figure “is as much as the property taxes of 192 Montreal families.”
The bridge, which is used commonly in the summer months to sit on as it’s placed in a city square, has gotten harsh criticism from those in the Western provinces, as many feel it’s a wasteful way to spend $800,000.
This, though, isn’t confined to Montreal. Edmonton, Alberta recently coughed up a hefty $1 million towards a public art display.
The province of Alberta has been entirely rat-free for almost 70 years. Although rats, quite obviously, meander into the province, they never stay long enough to breed, according to the National Post.
Rats are not native to North America, migrating on wooden ships to the New World from Europe, along with their fellow European puritanicals and imperialists. Unlike humans, however, it took the species a significant amount of time to move inland—not reaching Alberta until the 1950s.
Rats are hardly optimal immigrants and they certainly wouldn’t pass Kellie Leitch’s values test. Alberta executed a planned eradication of rat-kind in the summer of 1950: creating a sabre-rattling, propaganda division and employing Albertans to kill of the critters, using whatever methods they deemed necessary.
To this day, there are still no rats in the province. If a rat is spotted in the province, it is every Albertan’s duty to call up the exterminators and to alert the officials.
Throughout history, rats have wreaked havoc upon civilized, bipedal society. Take, for instance, the island of Hawaii, where rodents have destroyed the natural eco-system.
In Europe, rats were believed to have spread the bubonic plague, despite the disease actually being spread by the fleas that lived on them.