Categories: Canadian NewsCultureOpinion

Shepherd: Why we should be skeptical of government-mandated campus free speech policies

The Ontario Government announced yesterday that publicly-funded colleges and universities province-wide will have until January 1, 2019 to develop and institute pro-free speech policies on their campuses. The news release states that “Colleges and universities that do not comply with the free speech requirements may be subject to a reduction in operating grant funding.”

The free speech debate is an issue that occupies a special place in my life. Last fall, in my role as Teaching Assistant at Wilfrid Laurier University (WLU), I was hauled into a disciplinary meeting for showing a clip of The Agenda with Steve Paikin that featured professors Jordan Peterson and Nicholas Matte discussing gender-neutral pronouns. I secretly recorded the disciplinary meeting and sent the audio file to various national media outlets. After a third-party fact-finding investigation was conducted at WLU, I was exonerated – found to have done absolutely nothing wrong – and I also received a public apology from the university’s president, Deborah MacLatchy.

However, there was fallout after I received the apology. WLU’s LGBTQ resource centre, the Rainbow Centre, put up posters around the campus that read “Trans Students Deserve an Apology” and “What Happened to Laurier’s Gendered and Sexual Violence Policy?”, referring to the fact that conducting a neutral and balanced discussion about gender-neutral pronouns in the classroom does indeed violate the university’s Gendered and Sexual Violence Policy. To not blindly abide by the use of gender-neutral pronouns is to commit “transphobia” and “gendered violence.”

The Rainbow Centre had a sign in their window that read “Trans Students Deserve an Apology” until the school year had concluded. And in an op-ed entitled “It’s trans students and staff who deserve an apology from Wilfred [sic] Laurier University”, a staff member from the Laurier Students’ Public Interest Research Group wrote that “we need to acknowledge that debates that invalidate the existence of trans and non-binary people or dehumanize us based on gender are both a form of transphobia and gendered violence.”

For radical activists, it’s about power and revenge

When the trans students did not receive an institutional apology, they presumably decided to find another route to sabotage the win for free inquiry. The route they decided to take was using the university’s internal dispute system: in May, I received notice that a transgender activist affiliated with the Rainbow Centre had launched a formal complaint against me under WLU policy 6.1 – Prevention of Harassment and Discrimination.  The transgender activist said mediation was absolutely not an option, he wanted me to be investigated right away. Of course: for the radical activists, it’s not about mediation and trying to work out issues – it’s about power and revenge. This activist had previously bragged at an on-campus rally that the transgender students had power, claiming “you can see the fear in Deborah MacLatchy’s eyes…and she should be scared!”

How will campus free speech policies that aim to promote “open debate” and “the exchange of ideas” address overreaching Gendered Violence policies and power-hungry activists that manipulate the internal complaints system? At this point, they can’t. While the various free speech policies that will come into effect in Ontario on January 1, 2019 may encourage some students to speak their minds in class more often and offer their honest opinions, that doesn’t mean they won’t be notified of a formal complaint against them the next week.

University free speech policies try to appeal to both sides

At the risk of sounding cynical, university free speech policies are meaningless. They try to appeal to both sides – the side advocating for more restrictions on campus speech, and the side advocating for less restrictions. At WLU, a Task Force on Freedom of Expression drafted and eventually passed a Statement on Freedom of Expression that did exactly what I expected, and appealed to both sides.

It did this by championing the idea of “inclusive freedom” – scholar Sigal Ben-Porath’s notion that free speech should be vigorously defended, but all voices at the table must be equally included. Yet, the radical campus activists were not satisfied with “inclusive freedom”: at the on-campus Town Hall meeting on Freedom of Expression in April, one student accused the Task Force of being “white supremacists” because their draft statement was not clear whether or not white supremacy would be banned on campus (to which one non-white professor on the task force retorted “How dare you call me a white supremacist?”). Another student, while up at the microphone, announced their status as a transgender individual and gave a performative speech about being a “broken body” before emotionally hugging their friend and dramatically rushing out the door.

The Ontario Government’s news release states that universities and colleges must develop, implement, and comply with a free speech policy that “will not only protect free speech but ensure that hate speech, discrimination and other illegal forms of speech are not allowed on campus.” This still does not address the problem that will continuously come up: “hate speech” and “discrimination” are becoming more and more subjective. By virtue of treating Dr. Jordan Peterson’s criticisms of gender-neutral pronouns as a valid part of public discourse, I have myself been accused of both exposing students to hate speech and of being discriminatory towards transgender individuals.  Policy or no policy, the same struggle over free speech, open inquiry, and marginalized identities will continue on.

Lindsay Shepherd

Comments

  • Time for the Snowflakes to realise that their day in the sun has caused their continual temper tamtrum to melt away.

    Grow the "F" up and start contributing to society (and the tax base ) before you wake up tomorrow looking for something to become enraged about.

    People genuinely don't give a crap about your issues but they are getting fed up with the posturing, ranting, and anti-societal behaviour.

    Federal election next year ...... 'cause it's 2019!

Share
Published by
Lindsay Shepherd
Tags: Doug Fordfree speechLindsay ShepherdWilfrid Laurier University

Recent Posts

  • Canadian News

Toronto hotel gets one star reviews since accepting refugees due to harassment and overcrowding complaints

Another customer stressed that the hotel is not safe for children and complained about unacceptable conduct from teenagers towards his…

3 days ago
  • Opinion
  • Politics

Conversation, Not Censorship Is the Path YouTube Should Follow

The only way to defeat bad ideas is with better ideas.

3 days ago
  • Politics

Does the Conservative party have a future in Quebec? What about the immigration debate? An interview with Benjamin Tremblay PART 2

The future of the Conservative party in Quebec is diminished by Maxime Bernier's new party

4 days ago
  • Canadian News
  • Ontario News
  • Opinion
  • Politics

Scrapped! Ford government tears down Wynne’s costly Green Energy Act

Conservative Premier Doug Ford officially announces plan to repeal the Liberal government's Green Energy Act.

4 days ago
  • Canadian News
  • Opinion
  • Politics

America’s Congressional deadline to finalize NAFTA deal nearing, Canadian Foreign Minister will not settle

Foreign Affairs Minister, Chrystia Freeland, has revealed to reporters in Washington that her intention to maintain NAFTA is rooted on…

4 days ago
  • Alberta News
  • Analysis
  • B.C. News
  • Canadian News
  • Discussion
  • Politics

Is Trudeau serious about developing the Trans-Mountain pipeline?

Although PM Justin Trudeau assures the public that the Trans-Mountain expansion will be completed, his political alliances are casting doubt…

5 days ago