“Grow the f–k up…idiots”: Catherine McKenna hopes an angry Bill Nye will convince you on the carbon tax
In an attempt to crudely convince Canadians on the effectiveness of a carbon tax, Minister of Environment, Catherine McKenna shared a profanity-filled video of Bill Nye.
In the video, the popular actor-scientist tried to describe to viewers why carbon pricing would be effective in battling climate change.
“When something costs more, people buy less of it,” says Bill Nye.
Throughout the video, the child-friendly Bill Nye people were once accustomed to watching in elementary school breaks out of character and swears at those who doubt the effectiveness of carbon pricing.
“Grow the f–k up,” said Bill Nye. “You’re not children anymore.”
Despite several provincial government’s challenging the federal government on the carbon tax, the Liberals have been adamant about its implementation.
According to the latest development, Alberta Premier Jason Kenney has indicated that he will be abandoning his province’s carbon tax by May 30th.
Justin Trudeau has announced his new cabinet for the 43rd Parliament. Despite there being a great deal of speculation as to who would be included in the cabinet, there has only been insignificant change.
One of the more noteworthy changes is that Chrystia Freeland has been moved from her position as Minister of Foreign Affairs to her new position as the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs. She will also serve as the Deputy Prime Minister: a position that was first created by Justin Trudeau’s father, Pierre, and was done away with by Stephen Harper.
This will give Freeland broad power across the government and will only fuel speculation that she is being lined up as Trudeau’s successor. Quebec MP Francois-Philippe Champagne has replaced Freeland in the Foreign Affairs position.
The darling of the right, Catherine McKenna has been moved out of her position as Minister for the Environment. McKenna’s removal will delight the Alberta Premier, Jason Kenney, who has previously demanded that McKenna leave her position for the sake of national unity. The Member of Parliament for North Vancouver, Johnathan Wilkinson, is expected to take over McKenna’s position.
Despite Bill Morneau being heavily criticized for running deficits, and also being attacked for “elitist” campaign posters, he will continue to remain in his position as finance minister.
Due to Trudeau’s woeful results in western Canada, the prime minister was unable to select a member of parliament who was from Alberta or Saskatchewan to serve in his cabinet. Trudeau has also declined to bring in a senator to represent western Canada. As a result of this, the Prairies will be entirely unrepresented in Canada’s executive.
Aside from the names previously mentioned, here is the list of other cabinet transitions, as listed by the CBC:
- Ahmed Hussen, going to families, children and social development.
- Melanie Joly, to economic development and official languages, in charge of regional development agencies.
- Bernadette Jordan, to fisheries and oceans.
- Catherine McKenna, to infrastructure and communities.
- Dominic LeBlanc, now president of the Queen’s privy council, chair of the operations committee.
- Joyce Murray, to digital government.
- Mary Ng, to small business export promotion and international trade.
- Carla Qualtrough, to employment, workforce development and disability inclusion.
- Filomena Tassi, to labour.
Justin Trudeau’s Environment Minister Catherine McKenna had her office vandalized overnight on Wednesday.
The vandals spray-painted a sexist slur in red paint on her constituency office window. “C***” in all-caps was found on the front of the office Thursday morning.
McKenna responded to the obscenity by stating, “This is really beneath us as Canadians. I’m angry and, quite frankly, really disappointed.”
McKenna has often been subject to online trolling through her role in promoting the federal government’s carbon tax, including Rebel Media promoting the sexist nickname “Climate Barbie”. McKenna was also subject to similar offensive graffiti throughout the campaign trail, with offensive words being scribbled on lawn signs.
Recently she’s needed to have a security detail accompany her.
Catherine McKenna, the Minister for the Environment and Climate Change, held an event at St. George Catholic Church in February 2017 dedicated to caring for “our common home,” otherwise known as the environment.
The Green Churches Network hosted the event, whose mission it is to involve the Catholic church in the
Several guests representing the church spoke in support of environmental activism, with McKenna’s statements reflecting a rather unusual approach to tackling climate change.
Mckenna started her speech by towing the party lines; feeding into Liberal talking points.
McKenna is playing cynical games with Canadians
She discussed Alberta’s economic downturn, but in typical-McKenna fashion deflected the issue back to climate change, without considering the ramifications on its resource industry.
Claiming to understand the struggles of Albertans yet exacerbating the said troubles through policy and divisive vitriol is not helpful.
McKenna seems to acknowledge other’s perspectives but is quick to dismiss their views in the same breath.
It would appear her hypocrisy knows no bounds either.
“We cannot merely phase out the oil sands,” she states, only to then endorse the Liberal government’s closing of the coal industry while constantly pushing back target dates.
If I recall, Minister McKenna implied her opponents were climate change deniers for even questioning the viability of the carbon tax. Even the CTV host called her out for her divisive rhetoric.
The economic ramifications of a $50/tonne carbon tax, let alone a carbon tax in the range of $135 to $5,500 per ton per UN estimates, shows her plan is out of touch with the typical Canadian family. The costs incurred by them would be far too high, especially at the pumps and when it came to heating their homes.
Suffice to say, six in ten Canadians believe we face a crisis on pipeline capacity, yet little has been done to reflect the will of the majority.
Purchasing the Trans Mountain pipeline using $4.5 billion in taxpayer funds, to create no measurable gains in the industry, only further drives the point. It would be appropriate to say most seek to reconcile environmental concerns with our economic realities.
A “Green New Deal” or rhetoric espousing radical views is not the answer. But, in typical Liberal fashion, an elitist lens is used to identify and draft solutions to problems that affect us all. U
In Alberta alone, the typical family would fork out $1111 in federal carbon taxes by 2022.
Naturally, we’d look to the big energy companies to incur more of the costs, casting blame for not doing enough to combat climate change.
For the record, though, that couldn’t be further from the truth.
Energy giants have significantly reduced their GHG emissions to the tune of 28% per barrel of oil over the past two decades, employing carbon capture technologies that reduce the harm incurred by the environment.
Shell and Suncor have invested hundreds of millions of dollars in its efforts to facilitate the transition for the industry to reflect today’s claim to responsible resource development.
For example, Shell’s carbon capture facilities store four million tonnes of CO2 emissions across Canada, equivalent to the output of one million cars.
Suncor, on the other hand, spent $1.4 billion to replace its coke-fired boilers with cogeneration units.
And while environmentalists will quickly deflect to our increased overall GHG emissions since 2000, which is due to increased global demand that will continue until at least 2040, private enterprise has taken some much-needed measures in developing its resources more responsibly.
And it’s high time we recognized that.
Climate change as a means to espouse social justice
Following a rather ineffective attempt to lure Albertans into her climate trap, she delves into its effects on Inuit Canadians only to reverberate her sympathies as white guilt.
Maintaining the hunter-gather traditions of the Inuit is hard enough as it is, citing starvation, illiteracy and disease as the main contributors for embracing a mixed economy.
McKenna states, “The connection they have [to the land, reflects] who they are as a people.”
And while true, that statement lacks insight into the evolution of Government-Inuit Relations, misleads on climate action, and attempts to monopolize the views of all Inuit Canadians.
A Canadian reduction in carbon emissions can’t stop the warming of the north. Only the world’s largest polluters, like China and India, could make meaningful contributions.
Is Catherine McKenna of the belief that the Inuit are just hunters? She acts as if they have not adjusted to the times that, in part and as needed they must rely solely on hunting in the Arctic or risk losing their identity altogether.
It is as if McKenna sees the Inuit as a museum exhibit for the government to maintain and gawk at in a place of cultural stasis. As if someone cannot be both Inuit and an accountant.
Sort of smells a lot like eco-colonialism.
Ditto to the Liberal “consultation efforts” with First Nations and Metis groups on TMX. Ultimately, they proved misleading, as only those against the project were adequately consulted.
Later on in the speech, McKenna proposes that “We have to think about [climate change] the way First Nations think about it,” just further driving home the fact that McKenna thinks all Indigenous people hold the same values and are to be used as props.
Claiming or insinuating any group is a political monolith in an attempt to monopolize morality irks many, myself included.
Of course, it would be great to protect the environment of the north, but the way McKenna frames issues is insulting to the intelligence of different groups.
What happened to their promise of improving relations between the government and Canada’s Indigenous peoples?
What happened to their promise of a new “nation-to-nation” relationship that fosters healthy debate on reconciliation and bringing all Canadians together?
Through the same patronizing lens, McKenna claims that the effects of climate change are worse for women without substantiation. Instead, she uses anecdotal evidence in place of statistics, reports, or anything else credible.
She states, “Something that I sometimes tweet out, that gets a very visceral reaction, is the disproportionate impact of climate change on women. Not so many women here, although it would extend to Indigenous people when you look at what’s happening with the droughts in many countries.”
“Women are often the ones who are out getting the water, so they have to walk further and further. I mean, it’s why fewer girls are going to school because they are going further and further.”
While dehydration and limited access to education for girls remain an issue, even in the 21st century, her remarks paint
Let’s examine the case of Bangladesh. Sea levels are projected to rise 1.5m along its coastline, leaving it at three to fifteen times the risk in 2100 of extreme seasonal fluctuations in sea levels.
Questions remain over how this impacts the way of life of many Bangladeshis, especially for the rural locals.
Notably, Bangladesh also faced a humanitarian crisis along the border with Myanmar, following the mass exodus of over 750,000 Rohingya Muslims fleeing religious persecution.
As well, it’s poverty reduction strategy has had no tangible impacts in the western half of the country, with one-in-four living impoverished, according to the World Bank.
McKenna fails to grasp that the problems of the third-world are far more profound and complex than just climate change, but it’s politically advantageous for her to believe it is.
To McKenna, climate change is a platform to espouse social justice advocacy—the way she talks about it makes it overt. Climate change appears to matter based on the groups it affects, not the actual universal challenges it poses globally.
It isn’t meant to combat climate change. It’s about making sacrifices in the name of social justice.
Cathrine McKenna’s climate predictions are equally meaningless to the actions she proposes as a possible solution. The vitriol she espouses is not calculated or accurate. It’s used to scare Canadians into granting them a social licence that explicitly attacks our energy industry and its outputs.
According to an Abacus poll, 42
Considering the federal government deleted observed weather data, spanning from 1850-1949, misleading Canadians creates unhealthy narratives that leave younger demographics anxious. Reverting to doomsday scenarios instead of a pragmatic approach to combating climate change.
McKenna claims that “we used to spend 400 million dollars ten years ago on extreme weather events. [Now] we are up to one billion dollars per year.”
“20 years down the road [it will be] 40 billion dollars…If you’re worried about debt, ya know the government running up too much debt, think about that debt.”
Her 40 billion dollar prediction lacks substantiation, coming across as fantastical in light of no corroborating evidence.
If we are to assume federal funding matches the severity of the problem, McKenna is claiming that in 20 years, the issue of extreme weather events will be 40 times as great as it was back in 2017.
McKenna’s campaign of climate panic is sadly par for the course for her throughout her term as the Environment and Climate Minister.
Canadians deserve better than a paternalistic climate activist. Her oddly prejudicial views of people she claims to work for does not serve the best interests of Canada.
Former Liberal Deputy Prime Minister and ex-MP for Hamilton East Sheila Copps has once again found herself at the center of controversy, this time for cyberbullying a victim of sexual harassment.
Copps’ victim-shaming retort was in response to Alberta public servant Kristin Raworth questioning Minister Catherine McKenna’s sincerity on the issue of tackling bullying and harassment after McKenna campaigned Wednesday in Hamilton with Copps, who Raworth called “one of the biggest bullies on Twitter.”
McKenna has repeatedly done media interviews over the past couple of years condemning the nasty harassment she faces from online trolls as a politician. Hours after Copps attacked Raworth and McKenna had campaigned with Copps, McKenna was calling out bullying on Twitter.
Despite not tagging or mentioning Copps, the retired politician somehow found Raworth’s tweet directed at McKenna. Copps once again berated Raworth for her political affiliations and past accusations against Calgary-area MP Kent Hehr.
In January of 2018, Raworth and one other unnamed woman, both political staffers, came forward with stories of being sexually harassed by Liberal MP and then-Minister for Sport and Persons with Disabilities Kent Hehr while he was an Alberta MLA (Member of the Legislative Assembly). Raworth took to Twitter, and recounted their experiences of regular sexual harassment, outlining the culture of fear that surrounded Hehr’s presence in the legislative assembly for women staffers.
Following the allegations, Hehr resigned from cabinet, but maintained his seat in the House and is seeking re-election despite Raworth’s claims of harassment having been deemed founded by an independent employment law firm contracted by the Prime Minister’s Office to investigate the claims.
After coming forward in 2018, Raworth said she received an onslaught of hatred and abuse both online and in person, including abusive rape and death threats slipped under her office door at the Alberta legislature. The frequency and intensity of the abuse led her to have to acquire a police-issued panic button. Raworth says her latest interaction with Copps resulted in her receiving a few abusive messages last night, which she reported to Twitter support.
Raworth says this is not the first time she’s received online hate from former Deputy Prime Minister Sheila Copps, referencing a May 3rd tweet where Copps decried Raworth’s allegations as having “almost destroyed Kent Hehr.”
Raworth says she takes particular issue with Copps suggesting she has ever been dishonest about her political affiliation and is using these allegations to damage the Liberal party, noting she never hid her work history with the Progressive Conservative party in Alberta. Articles released the day Raworth went public with her experiences reference her as an aide to a progressive conservative MLA.
“It is an ugly way of addressing an issue that isn’t partisan because she makes it partisan,”she says, adding, “Sexual harassment in politics is pervasive. And its pervasive because of people like Sheila Copps who refuse to stand up when it happens on their side of the aisle.”
Ironically, Trudeau’s oft-quoted hardline stance on believing women who come forward with experiences about sexual harassment was voiced after a caucus meeting following the Kent Hehr revalations. Yet, just months after Raworth and the other harassment victim came forward, Trudeau campaigned with Hehr, and claimed his constituents were “lucky” to have him.
On this ordeal, Raworth expresses that she hopes this experience with Copps will be her last.
“Who wants to be publicly bullied by the former Deputy Prime Minister of this country?” she says, “If I allowed that to continue, and I didn’t speak up and defend myself—[victims] might see that and think ‘If this happened to her, what would happen to me. Why would I say anything.’ I want to ensure no one feels that way.”
McKenna’s office and Copps did not respond to The Post Millennial’s requests for comment. McKenna did not respond to Raworth’s tweet calling it hypocritical for her to be campaigning with Copps while also being an advocate against bullying.