Please note that this article may contain disturbing content relating to abuse against women and children.
37-year-old Nathan Larson will appear on the ballot as a congressional candidate in Virginia’s 10th district in this November’s midterm elections.
He has openly bragged about raping his ex-wife and has no problem talking about his sexual attraction towards children.
While admitting that he has had fantasies about father-daughter incest, he also claimed that plenty of women fantasize about being raped.
His platform includes legalizing child pornography and protecting “benevolent white supremacy”, even calling Adolf Hitler a “hero”. He also calls for “a system that classifies women as property”.
He has a 3-year-old daughter who thankfully does not live with him. He also remarried after his wife got a restraining order against him and then committed suicide.
He has also spent 14 months in jail for threatening to kill former American president Barack Obama.
The Story Only Gets Worse
An article on Huffington Post, fact-checked by Snopes, includes posts made by Larson on different websites known to be cesspools for scumbags just like him. Before you continue, be warned, that this gets quite ugly.
On one website he wrote:
“I just want to bang my daughter, actually, but even if it were legal, I’m not sure it would happen, since I don’t have custody. After sex with kids is legalized, parents (or other guardians) will still be gatekeepers to some extent, and a lot of them will want to bang their own kids and not share with others.”
And on another site, a website for suicidal paedophiles literally dreaming about having underaged sex-slaves, he wrote:
“Why doesn’t every pedo just focus on making money so they can get a pedo-wife and then either impregnate her with some f—toys or adopt some f—toys?” he wrote on the platform in October. “That would accommodate both those who are and aren’t into incest. And of course, the adoption process lets you pick a boy or a girl.”
On yet another site, he posted:
“Some men ask, ‘How am I supposed to rape a girl; I don’t even feel I deserve it, because I’m so ugly. Men like me should just accept celibacym rather than passing on our genes.’ Hmm, isn’t it convenient that the men who get pussy have done whatever they could to condition you to think that way? It’s almost as though they’re just trying to mindfuck you so they can get all the pussy for themselves. Yet are they being any more respectful to females than you are? Remember the lyric from Toasty Roasties, “If you want a virgin girl, it’s misogyny; but Chad choking them out is sexually free.”
“But why stop there? Why not establish a claim to rape any and all girls? Why not supplant Chad, rather than merely dethroning him to establish an egalitarian system? Egalitarianism has never been proven to be a stable system; hierarchies are better-suited to a species of individuals with unequal merit, who need incentives to strive for greatness. Hierarchies reflect the fact that humans naturally divide themselves into leaders and followers due to the need for division of labor and because some individuals have more initiative, boldness, and other leadership qualities than others. Pussy is just another reward that’s available for men to obtain if they take risks that pay off, rather than taking the safe route. If there weren’t a disproportionate reward for taking risk (e.g. getting more pussy than other men), then no one would bother to take risks, and humanity would stagnate.”
Other posts of his have been titled such things as: “Here’s How to Psyche Yourself Up to Feel Entitled to Rape”, “A Man Should Be Allowed to Choke His Wife to Death as Punishment for Cutting Her Hair Short Without Permission, or Other Acts of Gross Insubordination”, “Advantages of Father-Daughter Incest”, “The Justifiability of an Incel’s Kidnapping a Girl and Keeping Her as His Rape-Slave for Sex and Babymaking”, and “Let’s Define What Rape Is”
That last post states:
“Women are objects, to be taken care of by men like any other property, and for powerful men to insert themselves into as it pleases them, and as they believe will be in women’s own interests. In most cases, their interests are aligned, as long as the man is strong. Female sex-slaves actually get a much better deal than animals, because in most cases, they are allowed to reproduce, unlike animals raised for meat or companionship.”
A Fringe But Serious Problem
This congressional candidate is an extreme example of an increasingly more worrying trend, where individuals are openly attempting to provide disgusting justifications for sexually abusing children or causing real damage to others.
Some have even begun to connect previous civil rights issues to the disgusting behaviour online.
This ideology has most recently been responsible for terrorist acts such as the recent van attack in Toronto.
With activity online, in real life, and now even in politics, it may be time for mainstream institutions to begin to seriously think about the potential for damage by groups such as these.
In no sane society can we provide space for violent acts like rape and child abuse to become mainstays of everyday discussion.
What do you think about this mess? Let us know below!