Categories: Canadian NewsOpinion

Ad Standards Canada Censors Pro-Life Billboards in Contradictory Ruling

Most major ad companies in Canada voluntarily submit to something called Advertising Standards Canada (ASC). While they have no legal authority, ASC was established to ensure a certain standard in advertising.

To save advertising companies the headache, they were established to process any complaints of inaccuracy or offensive content. Most advertisers will take down content on their request.

We became acquainted with the ins and outs of Ad Standards this past summer when we entered into a contract with Pattison Outdoor to install over thirty billboards across Canada.

Inspired by the fact that up to 77% of Canadians are unaware that Canada has no abortion laws, our billboard addressed this with the simple statement “Canada has no abortion laws.”

A neutral phrase

“Canada has no abortion laws” is a statement widely used by abortion activists with pride, and widely referenced by pro-life organizations as something to lament and change.

Both sides have been saying this for years. Since 1988, Canada has had no Criminal Code restrictions on abortion, and there are also no provincial laws or college regulations governing abortion.

The week the billboards went up, the Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada took to social media encouraging their supporters to complain that the ad was inaccurate, stigmatizing, and demeaning to women, among other things.

All this in response to a statement used regularly by their own executive director, and easily found on their own website!

If we were surprised to see complaints from an organization that proudly makes the same statement we chose for our billboard, we were flabbergasted to learn that ASC upheld their complaints.

In both the initial ruling and the final response to our appeal, ASC offered no reasons as to why the pro-life advertisement contravened the Canadian Code of Advertising Standards, no reference to specific complaints that swayed their decision, and no response to our inquiry as to what wording would be considered acceptable regarding the state of abortion law (or lack thereof) in Canada.

ASC has removed pro-life ads before

This is not the first time a pro-life ad has been taken down due to an ASC ruling.

There are many such cases, but one in particular is worth noting here. In 2008, a decision was made against a pro-life billboard that implied that abortion was legally permitted in Canada throughout all stages of pregnancy.

In that case, ASC stated, “The Canadian Government has not, through legislation or otherwise, declared that abortions were either legal or illegal.” In their latest ruling they blatantly contradict this, saying: “binding Canadian law that permits abortion in Canada does, in fact, currently exist.

The contradictory nature of the rulings shows that it is not about the accuracy of the message, but about who is saying it.

At no point in the entire process have they been able to (or even tried to) show how the billboard violates the Canadian Code of Advertising Standards.The council said the billboard message is inaccurate but has failed to point to a single law.

As part of this effort to silence a particular set of Canadians, the ASC decision went further than dealing with the case in question. The ruling also included reference to bus ads in London, Ontario that were taken out by a different group, with a different advertising company, against which a local pro-abortion group also organized complaints.

Going beyond their mandate

As a self-regulatory body, Ad Standards has no authority to direct this, and this goes well beyond the scope of the initial complaints that were supposed to be the only focus of the decision.

The fact that ASC has been inconsistent and overreaching in their rulings shows an organization heavily influenced by activist pressure rather than the neutral self-regulatory body they purport to be.

Nothing has changed in the legal system regarding abortion in the last 10 years. Canada still has no abortion law.

This decision against a simple, non-graphic billboard sharing that message is a sad reflection on the integrity of an organization relied on to ensure fair and accurate advertising in Canada, and should call into question not only their effectiveness, but even their existence.

Share
Published by
Anna Nienhuis
Tags: Pro Life

Recent Posts

  • Opinion
  • Politics

Is anyone as stupid as the Liberals think we are?

In the wake of the massive SNC-Lavalin scandal and the subsequent ultra-transparent cover up, one question is still left on…

13 hours ago
  • Canadian News
  • Politics

PM Trudeau admits Jody Wilson-Raybould asked if he was directing her in SNC-Lavalin scandal

“There were many discussions going on, which is why Jody Wilson-Raybould asked me if I was directing her or going…

13 hours ago
  • Breaking News
  • Canadian News
  • Politics

Doug Ford posts video supporting #UnitedWeRoll, pro-pipeline protests

Doug Ford the Premier of Ontario has posted on Twitter a video highlighting his support for the United We Roll…

13 hours ago
  • 2019 Election
  • Politics

POLL: Conservatives would form government if elections were held today

According to a new poll by Campaign Research, the Trudeau government has been seriously impacted by the SNC-Lavalin scandal.

15 hours ago
  • Alberta News
  • Canadian News
  • Indigenous
  • Opinion

Junior hockey team forfeits season after team with Indigenous players “offensively” dance to Indigenous music

A Fort McMurray hockey team has forfeited their season after a locker room video sparked online outrage and claims of…

15 hours ago
  • B.C. News
  • Canadian News
  • Politics

Three times when dirty politics entered the Burnaby South byelection

If the Burnaby South byelection is an indicator of how October's federal election will play out, then we might be…

17 hours ago